Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	87.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171109
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '18 at 13:56
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Memory 96.2 1-Core 143 2-Core 280 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 842 86% 695 Pts	64-Core 1,142 71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 112 Parallax 93.9 91% 106 fps	MRender 97.1 Gravity 98.2 Splatting 98.3 80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 530 Write 414 Mixed 429 102% 458 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 94.9 4K Mixed 27.3 152% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 38.3 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 25.8 33% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 129%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 33GB free Firmware: DXT08B0Q Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 373 Write 46.5 Mixed 77.1 35% 165 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 8.54 72% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 26.9 DQ Write 41.8 DQ Mixed 6.61 13% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 841GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 160 Write 134 Mixed 155 113% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.21 82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 108%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB 1,657 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 559GB free, PID 3008 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 38.1 Mixed 38.1 49% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.28 55% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.5% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.1 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 20.3 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 53.3 75% 53.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 104%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	121x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	154x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,035

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16