Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '18 at 08:37
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 129
60% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 423
41% 335 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Palit(1569 1184) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 38.8
Parallax 52
35% 44.7 fps
MRender 53.7
Gravity 48.2
Splatting 36.3
37% 46 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
132GB free
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 294
Write 254
Mixed 173
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 14.8
79% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 91.2
DQ Mixed 14.1
24% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 91%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 383
Write 117
Mixed 150
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 8.11
74% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 91.8
DQ Mixed 9.64
21% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 73%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
331GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 37.2
Mixed 10.3
34% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.18
41% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.9% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback