Asrock H87M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H87M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory15.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 04 '18 at 19:16
Run Duration468 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4771-$129
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 148
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 503
48% 397 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Palit(1569 11C8) 2GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 11.1
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 8.57
Splatting 13.3
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 91.9
Write 105
Mixed 118
80% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.24
75% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 85%
WD Elements 1TB
849GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 36
Mixed 36.5
47% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.18
45% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
797GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.6
Mixed 37.3
48% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.33
73% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%
WD My Book 1TB
579GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 37.4
Mixed 18.5
38% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.38
88% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 22%
WD My Book 1TB
95GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 38.1
Mixed 21.3
40% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.27
62% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 22%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 8003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 4.51
Mixed 6.82
11% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.81
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.009
19% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F8G64CB8HC5N-DI 1311 M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 1311 M2F8G64CB8HC5N-DI 1311 M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M Pro4 - $151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $394
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback