Lenovo 6460DVU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 47% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Lenovo 6460DVU (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 6460DVU
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120227
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '18 at 11:59
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	75%
CPU Throttled	47%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9300-$70 3,287 User benchmarks, average bench 38% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Memory 62 1-Core 6.1 2-Core 33.2 26% 33.8 Pts	4-Core 33.7 8-Core 31.5 4% 32.6 Pts	64-Core 33.2 2% 33.2 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 570M 446 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 20D9) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 0.62 2% 1.95 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 2.91 2% 2.19 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS722016K9SA00 160GB-$31 340 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: DCDZC75A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 508 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8589934592 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 6184 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 6652 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 4497 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3553231021 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 92247 (C2) HDA temperature 119 119 223338758190 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	32.4% Below average	Read 55.5 Write 57.2 Mixed 53.9 42% 55.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.37 82% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 32%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 205GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 28.9 Write 14.4 Mixed 16.7 23% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.2 69% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 2.8 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 6460DVU

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)