Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Compaq-presario NP135AA-ABM CQ5105LA (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON NARRA5
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20090320
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '18 at 02:01
Run Duration	803 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core 582 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 36.8 2-Core 73.4 41% 61.3 Pts	4-Core 67.4 8-Core 73.6 9% 70.5 Pts	64-Core 74.3 5% 74.3 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 2A6C) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 307.68 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 56.7 Write 55.9 Mixed 52.5 41% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.3 69% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 8.4 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.5 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 93.4 43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16