| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA (all builds) |
| Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170322 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 13 '18 at 23:01 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.5%
Very good
|
78% 140 Pts
|
65% 532 Pts
|
41% 665 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.1%
Average
|
39% 49 fps
|
48% 59.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
121%
Outstanding
|
109% 489 MB/s
|
184% 65.9 MB/s
|
158% 263 MB/s
|
|
|
92.1%
Outstanding
|
98% 440 MB/s
|
141% 55 MB/s
|
111% 156 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
61.2%
Good
|
63% 22 GB/s
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
49% 81.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,523 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 1,156x |
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 177x |
| Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples | 79x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 339x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 233x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 91x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $1,187 |