Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '18 at 19:57
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 193
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 513
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8466) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 44.2
Parallax 50.1
40% 47.9 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 47
46% 57.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
235GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 478
Mixed 494
111% 496 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 24.3
107% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 89.4
105% 184 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 116%
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.2% Good
Read 268
Write 246
Mixed 259
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 24.9
86% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 52.3
73% 135 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 91%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
902GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 25.6
Mixed 27.7
36% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.16
4K Write 0.45
4K Mixed 0.32
31% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 49%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 32GB-$20
6GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.99% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 17.7
Mixed 19.7
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.73
4K Write 0.22
4K Mixed 0.1
40% 2.68 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.99%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $580
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback