Asus M5A78L LE

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus M5A78L LE (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120820
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '18 at 10:11
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 67.1 2-Core 132 58% 94.2 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 287 33% 255 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 6350 241 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 6350) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.14% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 1.59 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.14% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 174 100 174 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1042 (A6) Unknown 100 100 95 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 147 (A9) Unknown 100 100 22 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 128 (AE) Unknown 100 100 122 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 100 240518168619 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 4 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 14923 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1874 (F2) Unknown 253 253 3097	38.5% Below average	Read 221 Write 188 Mixed 141 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 2.48 58% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 27.7 DQ Write 75.5 DQ Mixed 4.39 17% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 78%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 60GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 56GB free Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 48722109020324 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2269 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 372 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 80 64429752355 (C2) HDA temperature 35 80 64429752355 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10922 (EA) Unknown 0 0 30141 (F1) Unknown 0 0 30141 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8313	31.2% Below average	Read 148 Write 58.7 Mixed 83.8 21% 97 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 10.8 68% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24.8 DQ Write 60.2 DQ Mixed 9.94 17% 31.7 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 80%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55 3,016 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 169GB free Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 72 16961351 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 67 67 34597 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 55 54 12224395362283 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 31935 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 72 72 29651 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 1791 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 39 639959077 (C2) HDA temperature 37 61 34359738405 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 49 98572299 (C5) Current pending sector count 95 93 118 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 95 93 118 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 63 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	36.1% Below average	Read 64.6 Write 60.9 Mixed 27.3 38% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.29 82% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 42%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 52GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 88 (03) Spinup time 129 129 12896370867 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7645 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 118 118 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14351 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2265 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7657 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7657 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 214749347873 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	55.3% Above average	Read 93.5 Write 99.1 Mixed 5.97 48% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.2 85% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 15.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 11.3 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A78L LE Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L LE

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	34x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	27x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	56x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16