Asus F1A75-V

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-V (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140530
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	May 06 '18 at 18:31
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Memory 50.8 1-Core 14.2 2-Core 56.4 26% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 186 19% 154 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Gigabyte(1458 226C) CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 38.1 18% 29.7 fps	MRender 25.4 Gravity 28.9 Splatting 34.8 25% 29.7 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -74079595024610 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1415 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1415 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 102 102 6379190 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1415 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 149324 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 58 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 149324 (F2) Unknown 100 100 209645 (F9) Unknown 100 100 3897	46.5% Average	Read 477 Write 149 Mixed 240 63% 289 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 8.47 55% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 44.4 DQ Write 63.1 DQ Mixed 8.09 19% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 136GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 68 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698548 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 674 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 789 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 547 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 674 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 674 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 150325166109 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	73% Very good	Read 128 Write 127 Mixed 114 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.2 82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905584-032.A00LF Kingmax FLFE85F-C8KL9 PSD34G160081 Kingmax FLFE85F-C8HS9B 12GB 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.5% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 11.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.8 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-V Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	2x
A4-3400 APUAMD $80Bench 36%, 2,796 samples	1x
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples	1x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	1x

SSD
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	1x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 53%, 13 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $81

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16