Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '18 at 22:27
Run Duration65 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 127
59% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 205
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 372
Write 63.2
Mixed 135
41% 190 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 5.63
56% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 49.8
DQ Mixed 6.47
12% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 36%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 1280 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.5% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.2
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme4 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $462
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback