Asus P7H55-M/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '18 at 18:22
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 96.6 1-Core 92.3 2-Core 185 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 359 49% 362 Pts	64-Core 361 22% 361 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Lighting 76.4 Reflection 75.3 Parallax 65.7 62% 72.5 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 71.7 58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB 14,802 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM02.H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 868 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 273 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 535 (AD) Unknown 100 100 327701 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 25 (C2) HDA temperature 66 60 171800133666 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3081 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2424 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4431 (F4) Unknown 100 100 5 (F5) Unknown 100 100 21 (F6) Unknown 100 100 805184	54.1% Above average	Read 268 Write 262 Mixed 262 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 11.2 81% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 23.9 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 11.9 34% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 110%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB 9,968 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 36682136 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1509 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2050307 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1850 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 669 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 522125343 (C2) HDA temperature 31 44 73014444063 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 36 33 36682136 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -98573794406876 (F1) Unknown 100 253 731767300 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3194268974	49.6% Average	Read 104 Write 68.7 Mixed 95.6 68% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.51 108% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 56%
WD WD6402AAEX-00Z3A0 640GB 6,247 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 47GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 42 (03) Spinup time 181 168 3925 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4644 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7736 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4576 (C0) Power-off retract count 195 195 4335 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 308 (C2) HDA temperature 107 100 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 193 815 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	40.1% Average	Read 71.3 Write 68 Mixed 71.8 53% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.43 104% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.83 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 10.1 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 51.9 77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M/USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	44x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	27x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	11x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	10x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
S3 500G 500GBSandiskBench 92%, 12,292 samples	5x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	76x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	42x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16