Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180306
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 27 '18 at 16:50
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 73.9 1-Core 111 2-Core 218 74% 134 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 675 65% 536 Pts	64-Core 866 54% 866 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3716) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Lighting 78.6 Reflection 78.1 Parallax 68.7 64% 75.2 fps	MRender 70.2 Gravity 74 Splatting 74.7 60% 73 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 214GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 848 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 655 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 59 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 730679424	104% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 414 Mixed 422 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 42.2 158% 53 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 23.7 73% 159 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 1,293 User benchmarks, average bench 211% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXZ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	201% Outstanding	Read 2,701 Write 559 Mixed 949 303% 1,403 MB/s	4K Read 52.1 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 29.2 190% 73.8 MB/s	DQ Read 51.2 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 111 78% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 133% ↑ This bench: 201% Great: 273%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 31GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7076 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3353 (B1) Unknown 93 93 77 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 50 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 97 97 2677 (EB) Unknown 99 99 137 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24381545585	73.7% Very good	Read 507 Write 299 Mixed 343 85% 383 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 17.8 114% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 39.7 DQ Write 60.2 DQ Mixed 17.7 22% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 108%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 29GB free Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -95408402613204 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2617 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1923 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 4711192 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1923 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 16194 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 76 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 16194 (F2) Unknown 100 100 52483 (F9) Unknown 100 100 609	68.5% Good	Read 512 Write 150 Mixed 231 65% 298 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 13.7 105% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 14.2 61% 138 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 468GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 63 163397974 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1060 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 3645155 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 815 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 637 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 60 471531548 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1119 (C2) HDA temperature 28 17 73014444060 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 6 1 163397974 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -31799937858900 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3237745666 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1873479559	102% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 163 Mixed 139 123% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.32 104% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 113%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 358GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 71 68 9034 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4744 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10815 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4716 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 10 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 56 193274183709 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 72 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4779	75.9% Very good	Read 126 Write 139 Mixed 108 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.5 130% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 75%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 199GB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 30.9 Write 21.5 Mixed 25 32% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.3 67% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB 26,065 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 29.7 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 25.3 75% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)