Lenovo 20378

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20378  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Y50-70
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 02 '18 at 21:27
Run Duration74 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 151
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 392
40% 323 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 2.07
5% 2.07 fps
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$112
923GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 495
Write 332
Mixed 349
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 9.68
49% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 9.39
12% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 16GB
1600, 1777 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.8
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 18.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20378 Builds (Compare 2,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback