Apple MacPro5,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro5,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F221BEC8
Memory121.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 08 '18 at 01:52
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU-A (00), 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 177
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 706
62% 529 Pts
64-Core 1,356
84% 1,356 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 374
Write 129
Mixed 174
49% 226 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 8.86
69% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 35.7
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 17.8
31% 58.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
188GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 79.6
Write 80.1
Mixed 79.2
60% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.28
85% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.8% Above average
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 25.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro5,1 Builds (Compare 900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Apple MacPro5,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $228
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback