Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '18 at 17:32
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 96.8 1-Core 158 2-Core 314 104% 190 Pts	4-Core 569 8-Core 877 89% 723 Pts	64-Core 880 54% 880 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB; ZT-P10800A-10P Zootac 1080 Founders Edition Watercooled +OC CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 145 Parallax 125 110% 135 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 132 Splatting 108 96% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 480GB-$900 1,995 User benchmarks, average bench 429% 195GB free Firmware: 0325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	470% Outstanding	Read 2,436 Write 2,089 Mixed 2,327 510% 2,284 MB/s	4K Read 244 4K Write 223 4K Mixed 182 722% 216 MB/s	DQ Read 599 DQ Write 567 DQ Mixed 304 305% 490 MB/s
Poor: 280% ↑ This bench: 470% Great: 541%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 106 13345667 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 -22402549400004 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2276 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1440 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13345667 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13345667 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13345667 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 41698 (EA) Unknown 0 0 27918 (F1) Unknown 0 0 27918 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13518	74.8% Very good	Read 512 Write 147 Mixed 207 63% 289 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 17.5 133% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 39.5 63% 121 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 82%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 26GB free Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 9504 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 953 (A5) Unknown 100 100 141767213480 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 30 (A8) Unknown 100 100 40 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 14 (AE) Unknown 100 100 104 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 43 184684773405 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 2203357020752 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 6282 (EA) Unknown 100 100 8602 (F1) Unknown 253 253 6028 (F2) Unknown 253 253 19795 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	87.3% Excellent	Read 500 Write 332 Mixed 342 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 21.9 117% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 52.4 100% 204 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 108%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 16GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	220% Outstanding	Read 1,586 Write 1,105 Mixed 1,143 283% 1,278 MB/s	4K Read 54.5 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 54.2 221% 79.7 MB/s	DQ Read 577 DQ Write 424 DQ Mixed 217 239% 406 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 220% Great: 254%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 482GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 108 102 7591 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8392 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 15208 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2267 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1421 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 122 122 235590 (C2) HDA temperature 117 112 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 5	45.1% Average	Read 82.3 Write 75 Mixed 73.7 58% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.12 51% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 431GB free Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 186676275 (03) Spinup time 95 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8900 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 63882974 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 18077 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 13 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2563 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 12 (BD) vendor-specific 16 16 84 (BE) vendor-specific 66 62 572194850 (C2) HDA temperature 34 40 55834574882 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 37 21 186676275 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 73199127642463 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1923487395 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1665715474	47% Average	Read 89.1 Write 74.4 Mixed 75.7 60% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.48 111% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 4,091 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 40.1 MC Mixed 33 106% 37.2 GB/s	SC Read 23 SC Write 43.5 SC Mixed 32 94% 32.8 GB/s	Latency 51 78% 51 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3,894x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	764x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	363x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	905x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	783x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	778x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	267x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	266x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	196x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	355x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	288x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16