ADD TO PC
BUILD

Cdcpointspa MS-7678

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Cdcpointspa MS-7678 (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI H67MA-E45 (MS-7678)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '18 at 18:54
Run Duration	307 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 169 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 303 42% 309 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 13.8 Parallax 14.3 15% 15.5 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 19 Splatting 20.2 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 240GB 2,789 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1161 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 92 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 91 (A3) Unknown 100 100 7 (A4) Unknown 100 100 5513 (A5) Unknown 100 100 9 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 3 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 7 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 28214 (F2) Unknown 100 100 25485 (F5) Unknown 100 100 22052	69.7% Good	Read 358 Write 362 Mixed 333 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 21.8 101% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 36.1 DQ Write 99.1 DQ Mixed 23.6 31% 53 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 149GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 131 6075 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1257 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25282 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1167 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 235 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 715770 (C2) HDA temperature 106 99 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.5% Below average	Read 57.5 Write 48.6 Mixed 12.1 29% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.16 55% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 59%
Mass Storage Device 500GB 5,742 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 321GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 33 Write 26.3 Mixed 28 36% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.4 90% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 22%
ST2000LM 003 HN-M201R 2TB 408 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 291GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 83.8 Write 102 Mixed 63.1 107% 83 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.25 62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 55%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB 540 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 165GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 33 Write 27.4 Mixed 28.5 37% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 0.62 4K Mixed 0.35 35% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 43%
Mass Storage Device 500GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 89GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 30.4 Write 24.6 Mixed 27.6 35% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.03 4K Write 0.21 4K Mixed 0.03 8% 0.09 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G3D21BCE1.16FN 2x8GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 15.5 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 15.4 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback