Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '18 at 02:00
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 90.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 264 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 517 8-Core 516 69% 517 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6161) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Lighting 74.7 Reflection 74.2 Parallax 63.3 61% 70.7 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 68.1 Splatting 70.2 57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 480GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 221GB free Firmware: SAFM01.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 746 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 943 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 443	89.8% Excellent	Read 526 Write 478 Mixed 507 112% 504 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 14.8 127% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 35.7 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 14.4 28% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 98%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1815 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 33 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 53 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3787668472	107% Outstanding	Read 527 Write 400 Mixed 430 100% 452 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 98 4K Mixed 28.7 162% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 28.9 101% 223 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 410GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 73 (03) Spinup time 128 128 12896633011 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1524 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 17726 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 182 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1561 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1561 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 188979871782 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	77.4% Very good	Read 122 Write 148 Mixed 148 105% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.18 82% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 4x8GB 163 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	85% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 27.7 86% 30.2 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 25.5 74% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	294x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	211x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	133x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	129x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	120x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	90x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16