Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJun 15 '18 at 04:57
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 181
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 431
46% 369 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 19.1
18% 19 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.3% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 54.6
52% 60.9 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 60.1
Splatting 62.2
50% 60.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,628
Write 1,112
Mixed 1,364
373% 1,701 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 41.9
186% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 101
109% 185 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 239%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
117GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 92.6
Write 70.8
Mixed 75.7
60% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.47
4K Mixed 0.05
16% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 84%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 83.6
Write 68.8
Mixed 72.6
94% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.16
62% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 52%
HGST 1TB
306GB free, PID 1014
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 93.4
Write 88.4
Mixed 38.8
89% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.17
54% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 21.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,159
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback