Asus A88X-PLUS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A88X-PLUS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	30 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160307
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '18 at 11:53
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 870K 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 70.4 1-Core 74.5 2-Core 145 57% 96.5 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 231 31% 232 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Lighting 32.1 Reflection 25.2 Parallax 30.6 26% 29.3 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 32.2 Splatting 31.6 27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 434 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 416 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 46 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 81 81 18680 (EB) Unknown 99 99 133 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4565597542	66.2% Good	Read 487 Write 236 Mixed 313 76% 345 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 18 108% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 3.58 DQ Mixed 61.2 34% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 129%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 195GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3564240 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 -34299608823465 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2401 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 984 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 44 90197196830 (C2) HDA temperature 30 44 90197196830 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3564240 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3564240 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3564240 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 39 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7272 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7272 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7467 (F4) Unknown 99 99 5308471	54.5% Above average	Read 483 Write 187 Mixed 265 68% 312 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 70.6 4K Mixed 9.4 77% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.5 DQ Write 62.6 DQ Mixed 11.8 18% 32 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 85%
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 108GB free Firmware: SBFD00.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2845 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2225 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 93 93 144 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2949171 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 224 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 68 (E7) Temperature 100 100 95 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5504	71.1% Very good	Read 440 Write 409 Mixed 436 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 7.82 88% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 25.9 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 7.72 30% 61.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 83%
ACER Hard Drive 500GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 296GB free, PID 2021 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 30.6 Mixed 13.7 31% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.86 4K Mixed 0.34 42% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36% Below average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 14.5 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 10.9 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88X-PLUS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus A88X-PLUS/USB 3.1

CPU
A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $889Bench 47%, 6,638 samples	5x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	4x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	2x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x
EWB8GB681PAE-16IC 16GBUnknownBench 43%, 35 samples	2x
F3-2133C9-4GXL 8GBUnknownBench 37%, 113 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $1,047

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16