Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '18 at 18:16
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 209
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 752
69% 576 Pts
64-Core 1,220
76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2703 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 10.8
9% 11.9 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 15
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 336 270 258 281 327 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 435
Mixed 376
SusWrite 320
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 50.6
174% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 45.6
107% 222 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 1.2TB-$1,000
248GB free
Firmware: 0171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1116 949 887 651 623 532 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,005
Write 1,147
Mixed 736
SusWrite 793
207% 920 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 277
4K Mixed 51.3
268% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,542
DQ Write 1,142
DQ Mixed 1,064
871% 1,249 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 227%
Great: 250%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
723GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 126 126 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 127
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 51.2
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 43.3
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 116%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback