Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '18 at 05:41
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 80.8 1-Core 119 2-Core 237 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 897 80% 675 Pts	64-Core 1,313 81% 1,313 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT 12,718 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 3.27 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.78 fps	MRender 4.48 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.09 2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SMS200S3240G 240GB 441 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 177 183 186 188 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 362 Write 273 Mixed 290 SusWrite 188 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 96.4 4K Mixed 42.9 153% 56.8 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 181 150% 212 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 84%
Intel 530 Series 180GB 4,011 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 82GB free Firmware: DC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 169 175 187 175 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 320 Write 192 Mixed 234 SusWrite 172 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 80.4 4K Mixed 35.6 137% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 128 127% 205 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 82%
Samsung P3 Portable 1TB 308 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 19GB free, PID 61c8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 99 85 103 93 81 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 109 Write 71.3 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 90.2 106% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 42%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB 4,338 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 336GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 63 62 63 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 64.3 Write 61 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 61.5 80% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.2 48% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2666 C16 1x8GB-$85 1,416 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (97^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.6% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 17.2 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 19.5 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)