Asus Maximus IV Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110221
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 08 '18 at 13:49
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 145
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 339
36% 285 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 18.4
16% 26.8 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 16.3
23% 29.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 84 80 86 85 88 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.9% Below average
Read 142
Write 108
Mixed 117
SusWrite 85.8
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 14.6
57% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 90.8
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 101
76% 102 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 83%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
52GB free
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 77 94 79 89 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 186
Write 184
Mixed 158
SusWrite 87.4
35% 154 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 10.4
48% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 1.7
48% 114 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
215GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 65 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 90.3
Write 86.7
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 65.7
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 67%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
10GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 74 66 47 45 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 71.2
Write 77
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 58
46% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
172GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 70 70 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 70.5
Write 49.5
Mixed 44
SusWrite 70
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $799
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback