Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 21:12
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 120
58% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 286
33% 256 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1559) 2GB
CLim: 1022 MHz, MLim: 1116 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 10.4
10% 12.4 fps
MRender 17.1
Gravity 13
Splatting 16.8
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 156 118 113 121 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 417
Write 384
Mixed 268
SusWrite 158
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 36.4
118% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 256
188% 246 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 114%
Intel SSDSA2BT040G3 40GB
17GB free
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 47 47 46 46 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 172
Write 45.6
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 46
18% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 15.3
63% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 37.2
DQ Mixed 57.5
47% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
576GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 89.2
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 84.9
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback