Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P6X58D-E (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100525
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '16 at 07:59
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 930-$249 19,497 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 67.3 2-Core 135 61% 97.7 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 342 35% 284 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470 5,537 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 8347) 1.2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.1106 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.5 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 21.2 16% 23.4 fps	MRender 31.1 Gravity 15 Splatting 21.7 18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 23GB free Firmware: 0002 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3294 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1149 (AA) Unknown 100 100 8819 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 5 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 206158430248 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 347 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	48.7% Average	Read 268 Write 127 Mixed 170 41% 188 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 4.52 86% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 19.4 49% 105 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 62%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC064MAG 64GB 1,591 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0002 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 309 Write 68.2 Mixed 31.7 29% 136 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 21 4K Mixed 3.65 52% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 59.1 DQ Mixed 0.74 9% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 53%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2.5TB free Firmware: MJAO Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 148 Write 142 Mixed 147 110% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.23 106% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 91%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 159 155 9041 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2709 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3322 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1219 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 38 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 192 192 24362 (C2) HDA temperature 127 107 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46% Average	Read 92.9 Write 67.8 Mixed 75.5 59% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.11 4K Write 0.52 4K Mixed 0.13 29% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 275 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 887GB free, PID 2312 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 85.4 Write 86.2 Mixed 83.7 110% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.4 71% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 16.2 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	496x
Core i7 930Intel $249Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	197x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	145x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	74x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	74x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	231x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	221x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	132x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16