| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus Z170M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit barev |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170210 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 12 '18 at 17:19 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.7%
Excellent
|
87% 158 Pts
|
66% 493 Pts
|
30% 493 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gigabyte(1458 3554) 2GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
16% 20.2 fps
|
17% 21.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
701GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 83 96 87 93 MB/s
|
33.6%
Below average
|
39% 53.2 MB/s
|
73% 0.57 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
331GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 127 140 143 142 142 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
82% 113 MB/s
|
135% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
100GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 48 49 50 54 57 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
40% 54.2 MB/s
|
136% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
75.1%
Very good
|
76% 26.5 GB/s
|
68% 23.7 GB/s
|
55% 73.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,226 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 384x |
| Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 289x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 198x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 120x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 113x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 92x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $536 |