Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F7
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150727
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '18 at 10:19
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca) 2,180 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 53.9 1-Core 33.7 2-Core 66.9 33% 51.5 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 118 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 95 6% 95 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F845) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 0.27 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.31 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 3.39 2% 2.84 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ128GVNU 128GB 310 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: JUTA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 173 232 261 306 246 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 425 Write 376 Mixed 241 SusWrite 255 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 25.1 67% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 206 154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB 40,451 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.7% Very poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 6.9 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.5 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 31%, 28,018 samples	14x
A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 34%, 2,180 samples	8x
A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 32%, 2,254 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	14x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	8x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	5x

SSD
MZNLN128HCGR-00000 128GBSamsungBench 69%, 476 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
THNSNJ128GVNU 128GBToshibaBench 75%, 310 samples	2x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	5x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16