Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180521
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 17 '18 at 22:56
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 888
89% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,152
71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 119
Parallax 101
91% 110 fps
MRender 99.3
Gravity 102
Splatting 105
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1690 1637 1662 1642 1602 1549 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,533
Write 1,795
Mixed 945
SusWrite 1,630
385% 1,726 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 74.7
267% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 878
DQ Mixed 928
713% 973 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 328%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
139GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,800
Write 7,274
Mixed 6,429
1,529% 6,834 MB/s
4K Read 599
4K Write 322
4K Mixed 410
1,604% 444 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 1,051
812% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
2TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 140 138 144 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 122
Write 128
Mixed 70
SusWrite 141
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C14 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 54.9
MC Mixed 27
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 10.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback