Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '18 at 15:19
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4330-$140
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 89.1
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 121
51% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 287
28% 227 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1046 MHz, MLim: 1485 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.3% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 46.7
23% 37 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 37.7
35% 43.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 532 431 450 311 310 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 620
Write 558
Mixed 556
SusWrite 391
119% 531 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 41.3
137% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 597
381% 436 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 107%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 39 39 37 35 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 104
Write 108
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 38.3
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 69%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 12 13 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 5.7
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 11.7
14% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1923 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 20.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback