CrucialCT240BX300SSD1
CrucialCT256MX100SSD1
$116

Controller: Silicon Motion SM2258. Flash Memory: Micron 3D MLC. Release date: Q3 2017.

 $116 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 63,037 user samples
7,269 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% 223GB free
Worst Bench: 65% 75GB free (System drive)
Poor: 65% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 283rd / 1072
55,768 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% 123GB free
Worst Bench: 65% 74GB free
Poor: 65% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 443rd / 1072
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
94.5 % Faster effective speed.
+14%
82.8 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
473 MB/s Faster read speed.
+13%
417 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
407 MB/s Faster write speed.
+28%
318 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
27.3 MB/s +2% 26.7 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
80.2 MB/s 88.7 MB/s Faster random write.
+11%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
365 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+26%
289 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
39 MB/s +4% 37.4 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
355 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+54%
231 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
514 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+13%
455 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
473 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+43%
331 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
32.9 MB/s Slightly faster peak random read.
+8%
30.5 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
118 MB/s 118 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
443 MB/s Much faster peak mixed IO speed.
+40%
316 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
49.7 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+12%
44.2 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
446 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+36%
329 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 75,637,442 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.04 % Hugely higher market share.
+300%
Value
Value For Money
22.3 % Hugely better value.
+129%
9.75 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 54 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score)
$43 Much cheaper.
+63%
$116
Age
Newest
80 Months Much more recent.
+32%
118 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
316 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue read.
+38%
229 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
363 MB/s Faster peak deep queue write.
+16%
312 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,143 Pts Stronger server IO.
+23%
930 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
299 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+64%
182 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
280 MB/s Much faster deep queue read.
+54%
182 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
279 MB/s 280 MB/s +0%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
243 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+69%
144 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
240GB 256GB
ADVERTISEMENT

Crucial’s BX300 SSD is a 3D MLC entry level SSD, with debut pricing in line with the Samsung's 850 Evo, the current market leader. The BX300 is one of the faster consumer SSDs available, with a 2% performance improvement over Crucial’s older MLC based MX200 and a 25% performance improvement over the TLC based MX300 which are both from Crucial’s more expensive MX product line. MLC NAND offers more consistent performance and has higher endurance than TLC NAND. Although Samsung’s 850 Evo (which is based on proprietary TLC V-NAND) has a 10% effective speed advantage over the BX300 the BX300 wins on write consistency. The 240GB BX300 has a three year warranty or 80 Terabytes Written (TBW) compared to five years or 75 (TBW) for the 250 GB 850 Evo. This makes for an interesting choice between the BX300 and the 850 Evo. Each model has an SLC cache which is proportional to its capacity, as a result the larger capacities offer better performance. The 120 GB BX300 has a 4 GB SLC cache, the 240 GB has 8 GB and the 480 GB has 16 GB. SLC caches improve burst write performance beyond the already respectable MLC write performance. Unfortunately, at least for now, the BX300 only comes in modest capacities, with the largest being 480 GB. For write consistency, thanks to its MLC NAND, the BX300 punches well above its price point. [Nov '17 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The Crucial MX100 is the first 16nm SSD to date. Aside from NAND, the MX100 shares the same hardware as its more expensive sibling, the M550. Comparing the MX100 and M550 shows that the two drives have similar read speeds but that the MX100 lags by nearly 50% at writing. The newer 16nm NAND reduces costs and accordingly the MX100 is the cheapest SSD (per GB) to date. In terms of performance the MX100 is a compromise which may or may not be worth making depending on individual circumstances. For typical desktop use including email, office documents and web browsing the MX100 is a great choice but power users should look elsewhere. Comparing the 250GB 840 EVO and 256GB MX100 shows that for a marginal premium, the Evo offers better write speeds. (Note: at 500GB they are more evenly matched) [Jun '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback