CrucialCT256MX100SSD1
$116
CrucialCT250MX200SSD1
$134
 $116 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2014.

 $134 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2015.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 28,153 user samples
20,940 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% 238GB free
Worst Bench: 59% 107GB free (System drive)
Poor: 59% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 321st / 964
7,213 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% 188GB free
Worst Bench: 66% 165GB free (System drive)
Poor: 66% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 172nd / 964
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
81.7 % 95.3 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
409 MB/s 428 MB/s +5%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
315 MB/s 412 MB/s Much faster write speed.
+31%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
26.5 MB/s 27.9 MB/s Slightly faster random read.
+5%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
91.9 MB/s 92.2 MB/s +0%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
283 MB/s 338 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+19%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
37.3 MB/s 39.9 MB/s Slightly faster random mixed IO.
+7%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
216 MB/s 336 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+56%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
455 MB/s 470 MB/s +3%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
332 MB/s 469 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+41%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
31.2 MB/s 33.1 MB/s Slightly faster peak random read.
+6%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
126 MB/s +3% 122 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
316 MB/s 380 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+20%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
45.1 MB/s 48.2 MB/s Slightly faster peak random mixed IO.
+7%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
328 MB/s 449 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+37%
Market Share
Based on 9,664,317 SSDs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.31 % Hugely higher market share.
+158%
0.12 %
Value
Value For Money
71.4 % 73.5 % +3%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
64 % 66 % +3%
Price
Price (score)
$116 Slightly cheaper.
+13%
$134
Age
Newest
53 Months 46 Months Slightly more recent.
+13%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
259 MB/s 378 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue read.
+46%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
313 MB/s 359 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue write.
+15%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
985 Pts 1,232 Pts Stronger server IO.
+25%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
182 MB/s 257 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+41%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
177 MB/s 312 MB/s Much faster deep queue read.
+76%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
271 MB/s 303 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue write.
+12%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
135 MB/s 214 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+59%
Capacity
Capacity
256GB 250GB
ADVERTISEMENT

The Crucial MX100 is the first 16nm SSD to date. Aside from NAND, the MX100 shares the same hardware as its more expensive sibling, the M550. Comparing the MX100 and M550 shows that the two drives have similar read speeds but that the MX100 lags by nearly 50% at writing. The newer 16nm NAND reduces costs and accordingly the MX100 is the cheapest SSD (per GB) to date. In terms of performance the MX100 is a compromise which may or may not be worth making depending on individual circumstances. For typical desktop use including email, office documents and web browsing the MX100 is a great choice but power users should look elsewhere. Comparing the 250GB 840 EVO and 256GB MX100 shows that for a marginal premium, the Evo offers better write speeds. (Note: at 500GB they are more evenly matched) [Jun '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 250GB Crucial MX200 is successor to the hugely successful MX100. Both drives use the same NAND and controller but the new MX200 features Dynamic Write Acceleration (DWA) which is a new dynamically sized SLC cache. Samsung were the first to introduce SLC caching on the 840 Evo nearly two years ago so Crucial are somewhat late to the party. SLC caches generally only help performance in corner case real word scenarios and benchmarks. I prefer drives without SLC caches because they offer more consistent and sustainable real world IO. Comparing the MX100 and MX200 shows that the newer MX200 has a significantly faster peak write speed which is of course explained by the new DWA cache. Price is the deciding factor between the MX100 and MX200 so although the MX200 isn't priced aggressively yet, it will almost certainly move up the value rankings when retailers build stocks and subsequently cut prices. [Feb '15 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2018 SSD Rankings.

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $340Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $234Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $97
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback