KingstonSH103S3/240G
SamsungMZ-7TE120BW

Controller: LSI SandForce SF2281VB1-SDC. NAND Memory: Intel Synchronous 25nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2012.

Controller: Samsung 3 Core MEX. Memory: Samsung 19nm Toggle Mode TLC. Release date: Q3 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 131,939 user samples
27,495 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% 1TB free
Worst Bench: 59% 25GB free (System drive)
Poor: 59% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 477th / 1072
104,444 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% 112GB free
Worst Bench: 63% 42GB free
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 312th / 1072
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
80.6 % 91.4 % Faster effective speed.
+13%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
375 MB/s 461 MB/s Faster read speed.
+23%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
243 MB/s 404 MB/s Much faster write speed.
+66%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
31.2 MB/s 38.9 MB/s Faster random read.
+25%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
82.3 MB/s 87 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
+6%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
274 MB/s 317 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+16%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
40.2 MB/s 45.8 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
+14%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
183 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+35%
136 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
442 MB/s 506 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+14%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
281 MB/s 489 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+74%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
37.8 MB/s 46.3 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+22%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
112 MB/s 118 MB/s Slightly faster peak random write.
+5%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
312 MB/s 392 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+26%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
49.6 MB/s 55.6 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+12%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
221 MB/s Faster peak sustained write speed.
+23%
179 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 75,718,380 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.03 % 0.07 % Hugely higher market share.
+133%
Value
Value For Money
13.2 % Much better value.
+71%
7.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 54 % +2%
Price
Price (score)
$70 Cheaper.
+18%
$85
Age
Newest
144 Months 129 Months More recent.
+10%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
298 MB/s 381 MB/s Faster peak deep queue read.
+28%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
264 MB/s 362 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue write.
+37%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
985 Pts 1,268 Pts Stronger server IO.
+29%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
289 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+61%
179 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
258 MB/s 339 MB/s Much faster deep queue read.
+31%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
209 MB/s 297 MB/s Much faster deep queue write.
+42%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
223 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+39%
160 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
240GB 120GB
ADVERTISEMENT

The HyperX 3K is an updated version of the regular HyperX, the only difference between the two SSDs is the grade of NAND flash. The regular HyperX's NAND flash is rated at 5,000 erase cycles vs 3,000 on the 3K version so broadly speaking the number of erase cycles before drive failure on the newer drive is approximately 40% less than on the original HyperX. The distinction is largely irrelevant for consumer users because even after 10 years neither of the drives are likely to come even close to their maximum number of erase cycles. As expected both HyperX's have very similar performance profiles which can be seen in this direct comparison of the two drives. Although the HyperX SSDs were strong contenders on release they are showing their age now and can no longer compete amongst the newer drives from Samsung and Plextor which are both cheaper and faster. [Jan '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 120GB Evo, like its 250GB sibling, features a second level Turbowrite cache (TWC). This 3GB block of high speed SLC memory allows the Evo to write data at 370 MB/s, nearly double its normal rate. When the TWC is full write speeds drop by around 50% but since consumers generally write less than 3GB in a typical write operation, the performance drop will rarely be noticed. On the other hand, in a server environment this sort of performance degradation would be unacceptable. Comparing the 120GB and 250GB Evos shows that they have similar performance profiles. The performance equivalence between the different capacities, coupled with the fact that their prices are almost linear, implies that both capacities represent roughly the same value for money. Within its TWC, the 120GB Evo is capable of chart topping burst IO rates and it sits squarely amongst the best performing 120GB drives. [Aug '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback