SamsungMZ-75E250B
KingstonSH103S3/240G

Controller: Samsung Dual Core MGX. Memory: Samsung 40nm TLC V-NAND. Release date: Q4 2014.

Controller: LSI SandForce SF2281VB1-SDC. NAND Memory: Intel Synchronous 25nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 852,528 user samples
827,550 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% 53GB free
Worst Bench: 73% 64GB free (System drive)
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 229th / 1058
24,978 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% 97GB free
Worst Bench: 57% 200GB free (System drive)
Poor: 57% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 487th / 1058
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
103 % Much faster effective speed.
+30%
78.9 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
471 MB/s Faster read speed.
+27%
370 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
428 MB/s Much faster write speed.
+80%
238 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
39.5 MB/s Faster random read.
+28%
30.8 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
93 MB/s Faster random write.
+17%
79.6 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
371 MB/s Much faster mixed IO speed.
+36%
272 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
51.8 MB/s Much faster random mixed IO.
+31%
39.5 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
246 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+41%
175 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
507 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+14%
444 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
490 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+74%
282 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
47.5 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+24%
38.4 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
124 MB/s Faster peak random write.
+11%
112 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
416 MB/s Much faster peak mixed IO speed.
+30%
319 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
64.2 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+28%
50.3 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
327 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+50%
218 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 47,218,290 SSDs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.19 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,875%
0.04 %
Value
Value For Money
13.3 % +3% 12.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
55 % +4% 53 %
Price
Price (score)
$100 $70 Cheaper.
+30%
Age
Newest
81 Months More recent.
+28%
113 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
386 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue read.
+30%
296 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
362 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue write.
+35%
268 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,284 Pts Much stronger server IO.
+30%
988 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
369 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+26%
293 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
344 MB/s Much faster deep queue read.
+35%
254 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
297 MB/s Much faster deep queue write.
+43%
207 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
310 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+40%
221 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
250GB 240GB
ADVERTISEMENT

The 250GB Samsung 850 Evo has a similar architecture to its hugely successful predecessor, the 840 Evo. Both drives are TLC based but the 850 uses 3D V-NAND as opposed to regular NAND. Both drives also feature a Turbowrite cache (TWC) which buffers up to 3GB of writes. The TWC enables high burst write speeds but when the cache exhausts write speeds drop to 300 MB/s. Comparing the 850 and 840 Evos shows that effective speed, has improved by 11% and the warranty has been extended from three to five years but prices are also up by 11%. The 850 Evo does put in superb benchmarks (second only to the 850 Pro) but these are only valid within the TWC. At current price levels the 850 Evo struggles to compete with the value leaders[Dec '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The HyperX 3K is an updated version of the regular HyperX, the only difference between the two SSDs is the grade of NAND flash. The regular HyperX's NAND flash is rated at 5,000 erase cycles vs 3,000 on the 3K version so broadly speaking the number of erase cycles before drive failure on the newer drive is approximately 40% less than on the original HyperX. The distinction is largely irrelevant for consumer users because even after 10 years neither of the drives are likely to come even close to their maximum number of erase cycles. As expected both HyperX's have very similar performance profiles which can be seen in this direct comparison of the two drives. Although the HyperX SSDs were strong contenders on release they are showing their age now and can no longer compete amongst the newer drives from Samsung and Plextor which are both cheaper and faster. [Jan '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 SSD Rankings.

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback