Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Direkt-tek DTLAPY133-1 (all builds)
Motherboard	DEFAULT_STRING DEFAULT_STRING
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170915
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '18 at 04:18
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 39.6 1-Core 39.2 2-Core 77.7 31% 52.2 Pts	4-Core 79.4 8-Core 80.8 11% 80.1 Pts	64-Core 74.4 5% 74.4 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4565 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.12 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 2.87 2% 2.04 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian N400 120GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 281 40 48 44 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 370 Write 302 Mixed 248 SusWrite 125 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 8.5 50% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 77.6 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 24.9 42% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	1x

SSD
Storage Space Device 254GBMicrosoftBench 88%, 639 samples	1x

RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16