Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 148 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 376 42% 327 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M 9,032 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 04CA) 1GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	2.86% Terrible	Lighting 3.43 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 2.03 3% 3.22 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 3.63 Splatting 2.61 3% 3.79 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.86% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0909 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 43 48 49 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 394 Write 50.3 Mixed 88.3 SusWrite 47.6 31% 145 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 13.2 65% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 50.1 DQ Mixed 23.7 34% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905469-024.A00LF 80CE M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 14.5 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 14 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1,261x
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	378x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	296x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	88x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	68x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	50x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16