Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '18 at 12:54
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 571
72% 549 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1762 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 38.4
38% 38.8 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 36.3
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 120GB-$50
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 86 88 70 89 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 454
Mixed 351
SusWrite 104
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 40.6
159% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 177
182% 295 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 89%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
24GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 474
Mixed 414
103% 460 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 66.6
231% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 355
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 178 177 177 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 158
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 176
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB-$30
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 23.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $664
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback