Asus P7P55D PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120927
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '18 at 12:26
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 94.4 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 185 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 444 38% 326 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% AMD(1002 2543) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Lighting 15.3 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 13.1 12% 13.2 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 12.8 10% 12 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 567GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 86 62 91 87 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55% Above average	Read 247 Write 229 Mixed 207 SusWrite 81.4 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 43.3 116% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 19 DQ Write 92.4 DQ Mixed 52.2 41% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 133%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 910GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 98 118 89 112 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 77.3 Write 144 Mixed 74 SusWrite 108 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.3 228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 75%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 691GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 76 57 76 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 59.5 Mixed 44 SusWrite 72.5 43% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 83%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 912GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 83 88 66 95 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 70 Write 149 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 85.3 68% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 7.5TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 15 10 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 22.8 Write 24.5 Mixed 22 SusWrite 13.5 28% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 2 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 75%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 7.1 5.8 6.8 5.3 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 32 Write 11.8 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 6.7 20% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.6 138% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 31%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 1TB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 164GB free, PID 61f3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 11 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 31.5 Write 23 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 13.8 29% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 7.6 549% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 337%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 29 21 28 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 39.3 Write 31.8 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 27.3 39% 30 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 11 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 58.7 68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D PRO Builds (Compare 314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D PRO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	104x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	96x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	12x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	102x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	99x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $483

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16