HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Z820 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158B
Memory	33.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150116
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '18 at 17:07
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 74.5 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 122 52% 85.5 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 460 41% 348 Pts	64-Core 816 50% 816 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000 1,173 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 11.2GB, Driver: 385.54 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.4% Average	Lighting 53.5 Reflection 49 Parallax 70.4 44% 57.7 fps	MRender 62.2 Gravity 59.5 Splatting 41 43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 20 21 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 439 Write 29.4 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 21.5 29% 138 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 26.4 89% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 36.1 DQ Mixed 82.9 81% 136 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 12GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 464 Write 431 Mixed 348 92% 414 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 38.9 130% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 248 188% 254 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 52GB free Firmware: A41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 74 74 75 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 82.2 Write 74.7 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 73.5 51% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 79%
ADATA HD710 1TB 3,736 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 350GB free, PID a15a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 26 26 26 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 28 Write 22.5 Mixed 16 SusWrite 25.6 30% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 45%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB 4,635 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 712GB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 82 80 82 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 77.5 Write 79.2 Mixed 49.7 SusWrite 80.5 97% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 43%
General UDisk 1GB 1,032 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.1 2 2.1 2 2.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Read 6.2 Write 1.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 2 3% 3.05 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 8%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 16,068 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.9 4 4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	2.47% Terrible	Read 8.2 Write 1.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.7 5% 4.45 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.47% Great: 7%
TDK LoR TF10 16GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 11GB free, PID 0710 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 19.6 Write 17.7 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 16.8 25% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.2 151% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 48GB 1600, 1333, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	62.5% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 24.2 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

SSD
860 500GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,934 samples	55x
860 1TBSamsungBench 86%, 2,531 samples	37x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	32x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16