| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180420 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 07 '18 at 13:01 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | SVK-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.8%
Good
|
68% 120 Pts
|
51% 379 Pts
|
24% 385 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
16% 23.1 fps
|
20% 24 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$31
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 204 196 205 199 198 MB/s
|
95.1%
Outstanding
|
78% 347 MB/s
|
160% 58.9 MB/s
|
210% 294 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
51.6%
Above average
|
51% 17.9 GB/s
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
43% 92.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 831 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 162x |
| Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples | 85x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 103x |
| RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 50x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 42x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $231 |