Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B45
Motherboard	MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180709
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '18 at 23:46
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0000 310 User benchmarks, average bench 94% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 95.3 1-Core 106 2-Core 214 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 642 63% 516 Pts	64-Core 856 53% 856 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.98 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.6% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 107 Parallax 92.8 84% 101 fps	MRender 93.7 Gravity 94.9 Splatting 96.3 78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB 13,939 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1361 1543 610 611 613 612 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 2,390 Write 1,891 Mixed 704 SusWrite 892 326% 1,469 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 51.1 180% 65.1 MB/s	DQ Read 831 DQ Write 727 DQ Mixed 766 578% 775 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 313%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 82GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 152 151 152 152 152 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 370 Write 355 Mixed 307 SusWrite 179 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 30 97% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 152 113% 150 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 115%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 480GB free Firmware: 05.F1F.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 97 97 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 99.3 Write 95.3 Mixed 73 SusWrite 96.3 67% 91 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 222% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 5,376 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	MC Read 36.2 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 31.6 102% 35.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 36.7 SC Mixed 28.7 81% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 56.3 71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	154x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	140x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	137x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	194x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	121x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	85x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $964

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16