Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4350-$57 11,995 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 73.8 2-Core 136 61% 99.2 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 225 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 228 14% 228 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Sapphire(174B 2015) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Lighting 28.5 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 35.7 23% 31.9 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 23.7 Splatting 37.3 25% 29.7 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 23%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Reactor 512GB-$280 923 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: O082 SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 309 208 155 157 149 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 394 Write 333 Mixed 81.9 SusWrite 214 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 27 87% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 187 150% 211 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	43.1% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 15.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 13.1 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	43x
BLS4G3D1609DS 2x4GBCrucialBench 43%, 4,102 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	20x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $516

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16