Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory47.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140305
Uptime21.2 Days
Run DateSep 11 '18 at 22:10
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 92%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4930K-$600
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.8% Above average
SC Int 66.3
SC Float 68
SC Mixed 69.5
54% 67.9 Pts
QC Int 240
QC Float 226
QC Mixed 264
55% 243 Pts
MC Int 643
MC Float 661
MC Mixed 651
98% 651 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750 Ti-$110
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 361.43
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 46.8
Parallax 67.8
22% 62 fps
MRender 55.7
Gravity 58.8
Splatting 40.8
22% 51.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22%
Great: 25%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$190
33GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 231 210 216 212 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 469
Write 424
Mixed 196
SusWrite 223
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 9.9
71% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 42.8
89% 181 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 118%
Areca RAID#1 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: R001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 620 543 569 597 578 581 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
214% Outstanding
Read 2,063
Write 2,795
Mixed 708
SusWrite 582
344% 1,537 MB/s
4K Read 142
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 0.1
285% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 14.6
139% 319 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 214%
Great: 525%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$84
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 93 99 108 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 158
Write 138
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 97.9
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.5
303% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 110%
General USB Flash Disk 64GB
59GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 13 6.8 9.6 9.2 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
7.48% Terrible
Read 32
Write 3.8
Mixed 12
SusWrite 9.9
16% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.48%
Great: 39%
DIGINTEL HotSwap Bay1 512GB
460GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 131 132 131 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
213% Outstanding
Read 248
Write 249
Mixed 236
SusWrite 139
292% 218 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 28.2
2,605% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 78
DQ Mixed 34
3,921% 47.3 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 35.4
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,418
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $345Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $64
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $350AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $148SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback