Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '18 at 14:46
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 140 2-Core 271 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 739 76% 615 Pts	64-Core 742 46% 742 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8626) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.63 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31% Below average	Lighting 38.5 Reflection 31 Parallax 37.5 31% 35.7 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 35.4 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ190000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 93 64 111 125 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 326 Write 75 Mixed 154 SusWrite 90.7 35% 161 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 15.5 61% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 92.6 DQ Write 35.4 DQ Mixed 5.7 20% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 55%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB 898 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 7.5TB free Firmware: GX2M SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 221 243 230 230 241 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 236 Write 237 Mixed 99.8 SusWrite 232 146% 201 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.7 290% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 131%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB 898 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 7.5TB free Firmware: GX2M SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 221 242 242 225 244 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 213 Write 214 Mixed 97.7 SusWrite 233 138% 189 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.9 245% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 131%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 190 201 197 197 204 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFD824A.C16FE 859B CT8G4DFS824A.M8FB 16GB 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.8% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 21.9 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 21.6 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	79x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	48x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	25x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	18x

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $499

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16