Asus B150M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B150M-A (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150831
Uptime	6.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '18 at 15:43
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$130 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 192 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 418 54% 405 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Zotac(19DA 1376) 2GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	35% Below average	Lighting 45.2 Reflection 43.8 Parallax 39.8 37% 42.9 fps	MRender 39.6 Gravity 40.9 Splatting 35.6 31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS2211 480GB-$70 2,197 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS221016 SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 144 180 173 150 202 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 384 Write 247 Mixed 319 SusWrite 182 63% 283 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 35.3 106% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 184 180% 284 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 329GB free Firmware: MS2OA8A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 103 101 102 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 154 Write 134 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 103 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 107%
SMI USB DISK 32GB 2,299 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 28GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 10 14 12 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	4.2% Terrible	Read 8 Write 3 Mixed 12 SusWrite 12.3 12% 8.82 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.2% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 1x8GB 3,078 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.2% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B150M-A Builds (Compare 1,248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus B150M-A - $285

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	255x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	244x
Core i5-6400Intel $77Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	234x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	136x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	130x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	119x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	41x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	39x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $888

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16