Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 3,842 User benchmarks, average bench 83% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 242 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 604 67% 527 Pts	64-Core 917 57% 917 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 377.11 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Lighting 29.6 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 27.7 24% 29.3 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 28.3 Splatting 27.7 22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GB 4,113 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 101 55 56 56 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 428 Write 245 Mixed 305 SusWrite 83.9 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 40.3 134% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 47.9 90% 174 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 112%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 4,056 User benchmarks, average bench 250% 149GB free Firmware: 6L6QCXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 703 637 647 664 662 654 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	164% Outstanding	Read 1,597 Write 1,291 Mixed 514 SusWrite 661 226% 1,016 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 43.8 141% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 443 DQ Mixed 339 259% 343 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 331%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 4,056 User benchmarks, average bench 250% 279GB free Firmware: 6L6QCXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 799 768 785 806 802 785 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,651 Write 825 Mixed 445 SusWrite 791 205% 928 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 42.1 141% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 324 222% 272 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 331%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC 4x8GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 37 MC Write 52.4 MC Mixed 41.4 125% 43.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 17.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 123%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples	1x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro P2200NvidiaBench 47%, 5,007 samples	1x
GeForce RTX 3060NvidiaBench 100%, 1,106 samples	1x

SSD
MZVPV256HDGL-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 192%, 3,288 samples	1x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 250%, 4,056 samples	1x

RAM
HMA84GR7AFR4N-TF HMA84GR7AFR4N-TF HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 127GBHynixBench 92%, 1 sample	1x
HMA41GR7AFR8N-UH 4x8GBHynixBench 99%, 199 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16