ADD TO PC
BUILD

Zoostorm 7200-5289A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5289A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock Z170 Pro4S
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '18 at 02:00
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 93.8 1-Core 141 2-Core 278 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 684 72% 574 Pts	64-Core 763 47% 763 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 368.81 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 93% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 500GB-$100 6,800 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 300 305 306 303 301 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 330 Mixed 240 SusWrite 306 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 45.9 162% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 249 195% 270 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 103%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 1TB 658 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 372GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 139 151 163 130 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 411 Write 153 Mixed 206 SusWrite 133 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 4.3 43% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 162 161 159 162 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 154 Mixed 84 SusWrite 160 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GB 9,100 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 22.9 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 34.3 SC Mixed 27 78% 27.1 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback