Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4210H 12,540 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 101 2-Core 162 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 263 35% 261 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M 18,736 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Acer(1025 0926) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9924 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	7.01% Terrible	Lighting 7.27 Reflection 14.4 Parallax 16.5 6% 12.7 fps	MRender 22.9 Gravity 15.5 Splatting 0.13 9% 12.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 7.01% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon IT L8T-64L9G 60GB 273 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: H861201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 146 162 164 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 471 Write 167 Mixed 208 SusWrite 161 56% 252 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 30.1 109% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 166 144% 218 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 80%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 923GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 96 110 109 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 110 Write 111 Mixed 57.4 SusWrite 106 70% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB 44,908 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	32.3% Below average	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16