Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	40% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 (all builds)
Memory	20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110307
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '18 at 21:52
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5660 6,950 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 97.8 1-Core 106 2-Core 213 81% 139 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 661 67% 543 Pts	64-Core 799 49% 799 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Asus(1043 3003) 3GB CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.9.3 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	40% Average	Lighting 52.3 Reflection 34.8 Parallax 65.8 43% 51 fps	MRender 33.1 Gravity 50.9 Splatting 43.2 35% 42.4 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 35 28 28 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 370 Write 230 Mixed 254 SusWrite 53.6 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 40 130% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 84.9 81% 126 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 25GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 85 79 56 53 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 74 Write 71 Mixed 60.9 SusWrite 73.1 52% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 76%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$92 5,580 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 68GB free Firmware: RR04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 106 107 104 107 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 82.1 Write 151 Mixed 84 SusWrite 107 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 262% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.3% Good	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 22.3 60% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 14.3 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 47.1 85% 47.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD7 Builds (Compare 414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	66x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	59x
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	30x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	78x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	65x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $409

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16