PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 REV 3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121101 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 13 '18 at 16:49 |
Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
Run User | MNG-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
85.6%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 332.21
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 148 148 148 133 146 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 201 200 197 201 201 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 160x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 122x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 74x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 48x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 44x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 37x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $498 |