Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3 DDR3-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150901
Uptime	8.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '18 at 17:40
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	69% Good	Memory 73.3 1-Core 104 2-Core 209 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 365 50% 370 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36AC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Lighting 49.8 Reflection 46.1 Parallax 40.7 41% 45.5 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 41.7 Splatting 35.2 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 135 89 82 84 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 419 Write 390 Mixed 294 SusWrite 131 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 87.9 4K Mixed 45.8 155% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 328 254% 349 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 51GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 158 152 142 149 156 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 146 Write 144 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 151 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 11GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 5.6 5.4 5.5 5.2 3.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 13.3 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 5.9 22% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.2 90% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 2x8GB 2,124 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.1% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 16.9 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 16.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 94 42% 94 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	12x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	11x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	4x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	7x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	4x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $167

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16