Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3410MX APU 1,071 User benchmarks, average bench 38% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 61.6 1-Core 26.2 2-Core 42.7 31% 43.5 Pts	4-Core 61.7 8-Core 99.4 10% 80.6 Pts	64-Core 83.9 5% 83.9 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G 8,067 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C609) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 1.75 2% 2.27 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.47 Splatting 3.04 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 200 208 207 222 204 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.5% Above average	Read 225 Write 211 Mixed 203 SusWrite 205 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 23.6 77% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 155 117% 157 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 9 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B2873FHS-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 3GBSamsungBench 23%, 217 samples	2x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	2x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16